data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bb4d/1bb4dd162dc5aa87542a3586a226625e5d8a107f" alt=""
The artist's reception for the American Tapestry Biennial 8 at the Textile Museum in Lowell, MA was last night. I did not take photos at the reception, except for this one my husband took of Jan Austen and me with our pieces, which hung together.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99a43/99a439ffd9b1eee74b6a9a3c88fc92b8b7259cc7" alt=""
The Museum is very interesting. We had gone earlier in the afternoon, so we could see the textile history portion of the museum.
There were a number of the artists present at the reception. The museum staff had done a beautiful job of hanging the exhibit. Another wonderful accomplishment, ATA! It is always a plus, when I leave an exhibit, to go home anxious to get back to the loom.
Addendum: There is always something that, though it shouldn't at this point, brings me up short at an exhibit opening. This time was no exception. A man approached me and, seeing my artist's name tag, said, " Oh, you're the one that did the tapestry that looks like a photograph!" I wasn't sure how to respond to that. The tapestry, "January," is of the view from my upstairs window. It is the view that I looked at virtually every day last January, February, and the December before. When I looked at the view, I thought, 'that looks like a tapestry to me.' I did take photos of the view, but I also sketched it. When I developed the image into the tapestry cartoon, I worked from both the photos and the sketch, to capture the image of the tapestry I had envisioned. I deleted a lot of information from the photo, as superfluous, or unweavable. I simplified the photos to what I almost saw to be abstract; to look like a tapestry. To me, the photos looked like a tapestry. The tapestry has never looked like a photo. I don't know why that difference struck me, when the man made that observation, but it did. It always strikes me as odd that the artist's view can be so different, almost a flip-flop view, from what a viewer will see.
3 comments:
I'm new here, and was drawn by seeing the name of your blog on another (Camp Runamuck). Only blog readers of *a certain age* would recognize the phrase. The creativity that infuses your life -- jellyfish that look like knitted sculptures! -- dazzles and inspires me. I weave, but tapestry is just too fidgety for me, I fear. But I'll never look at my Ipad quite the same way again! Keep on keeping on, and I look forward to reading your observations about the journey. Godspeed.
My theory is that people think it looks like a photo because it looks real. So in that sense it's a compliment right? People are not used to seeing weaving with a recognizable realistic image.
I was so moved by this piece when I first saw it, and I still am! I love how you've captured such light and shadow in cloth. I think Jan has hit it on the nail that the man who commented on how much this piece looks like a photograph, was probably most impressed that you captured a scene and he understood perfectly what that realistic scene was. For those of us with more experience looking at tapestry, we see more what *you* did with it. More than capturing a scene, you have captured a winter's day.
Post a Comment